Nested Loop Join and Hash Join are two types of physical join operators in SQL Server, each optimized for different use cases depending on data size, availability of indexes, and whether the data is sorted. Below are the difference between them.
Sno |
Feature |
Nested
Loop Join |
Hash
Join |
1 |
Use Case |
Small datasets or highly selective joins |
Large, unsorted datasets |
2 |
Data Requirements |
No specific data order required |
No specific data order required |
3 |
Execution Strategy |
Iteratively checks each row in one table against
rows in the other |
Builds a hash table on one input and probes with
the other |
4 |
Performance |
Efficient for small datasets or when one input is small and indexed |
Efficient for large datasets where no indexes exist |
5 |
Index Dependency |
May benefit from indexes but does not require
them |
No index needed |
6 |
Memory Requirement |
Low; does not require large memory allocations |
High; requires memory to store the hash table |
7 |
Typical Complexity |
O(N*M), less efficient as dataset sizes increase |
O(N + M), more efficient with large datasets |
8 |
Data Matching Type |
Effective for both equality and inequality joins |
Best for equality joins (e.g., =) |
9 |
Spill to Disk |
Low risk, minimal memory usage |
May spill to disk if memory is insufficient |
10 |
Scenarios |
Useful for small tables or small subsets of data |
Ideal for large, unsorted tables |
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you have any doubt, please let me know.